Brexit, COVID, energy vulnerability, and inflation have all made one thing clear: disruption is no longer an occasional hurdle - it’s a constant.
For transformation leaders, this shifting landscape highlights new risks in a fragmented global environment where old alliances are less reliable.
Digital sovereignty offers a lens through which organisations can navigate these challenges. At its core, it’s about control - ensuring that your state, organisation, or even individual teams have authority over their digital infrastructure, data, and technologies, without unmanaged reliance on external entities.
In short, it’s about creating appropriate autonomy in an interconnected world.
Achieving true digital autonomy isn’t straightforward. What “autonomy” means varies depending on where you are in the world. In Europe, we focus heavily on privacy and regulatory frameworks. In other regions, state-led or private-sector-dominated models prevail.
The reality is that Europe outsources much of its infrastructure to benefit from economies of scale. This outsourcing can make transparency harder, especially when systems are interconnected and complex. Regulations in the UK and EU help drive provider accountability, but they can also add layers of complexity to innovation.
Consumers, meanwhile, expect seamless, connected experiences – and they take them for granted. A purely isolationist approach to sovereignty risks creating fragmentation, undermining the ability to deliver the digital services users expect.
Digital sovereignty isn’t a box-ticking exercise. It requires a nuanced understanding of risks and a roadmap for building resilience. Transformation leaders should start with a clear view of the following areas:
For some organisations, particularly those with simpler requirements, on-premise open-source solutions seem attractive. They offer low upfront costs and full control. But the trade-offs soon become clear.
Enterprise features require bespoke integrations and ongoing support. Over time, the cost of maintaining and updating these platforms to keep up with regulatory changes escalates – and technical debt builds fast. As systems age, dependence on a small group of familiar developers becomes a serious risk, undermining resilience.
Organisations with more complex needs – personalisation, asset management, experimentation, and advanced workflows – often find that enterprise platforms deliver functionality faster and more effectively.
Historically, some turned to platforms like Sitecore for on-premise control. But Sitecore is moving away from its XP product to a SaaS-first model (XM Cloud), making full hosting and data control increasingly difficult unless you have significant Azure alignment and investment.
Optimizely, by contrast, continues to offer a flexible PaaS model alongside SaaS. With proper configuration and contractual safeguards, Optimizely CMS deployed in UK Azure regions can meet the digital sovereignty expectations of UK-regulated organisations while still delivering a modern, enterprise-ready digital experience platform (DXP).
Optimizely’s architecture supports a headless and composable approach. This means you can integrate best-in-breed solutions while avoiding vendor lock-in – a crucial element of any sovereignty strategy.
It’s not a case of “set and forget.” You’ll still need to define how you comply with regulations. By briefing your implementation partner on your organisation’s specific data handling requirements, you ensure your platform configuration is tailored to your needs.
Feature / Platform |
Optimizely |
Sitecore |
Kentico |
Umbraco |
Hosting Flexibility |
✅ High |
⚠️ Medium (Azure-focused) |
✅ High |
✅ High |
Data Sovereignty |
✅ Strong |
⚠️ Mixed |
✅ Strong |
✅ Strong |
Open Source |
❌ |
❌ |
❌ |
✅ |
Enterprise Features |
✅ |
✅ |
✅ |
⚠️ Limited |
Ease of Use |
✅ |
⚠️ Complex |
✅ |
✅ |
Headless Support |
✅ |
✅ |
✅ |
✅ |
Data Protection |
✅ |
✅ |
✅ |
✅ |
For C-Suite leaders seeking to reduce organisational risk, here’s a strategic approach:
For organisations with enterprise-grade requirements, Optimizely DXP hosted in Microsoft Azure UK regions strikes a strong balance – providing advanced capabilities while meeting the controls demanded by UK-regulated industries such as financial services, energy, and telecoms.
Regulation / Guidance |
Key Sovereignty Implications |
UK GDPR & Data Protection Act 2018 |
Personal data must remain under the controller’s authority; cross-border transfers require safeguards. |
Prudential Regulation Authority SS2/21 |
Outsourcing arrangements must evidence data location, access, audit rights, exit strategies, and resilience. |
FCA Handbook – SYSC 8/13 |
Organisations must manage cloud and third-party risks proportionately and demonstrate oversight and data protection. |
NCSC Cloud Security Principles |
Emphasise data residency, secure management, supply chain assurance, and portability. |
Sector-specific standards (e.g. Ofgem, Ofcom, ISO 27001, Cyber Essentials Plus) |
Require certified environments, incident reporting, and business continuity planning. |
Optimizely provides the flexibility, capability, and compliance to support organisations that take sovereignty seriously. If you’re planning your next DXP investment – and need to ensure it aligns with your sovereignty goals – let’s talk about how we can help you deliver it right.